Wednesday, February 8, 2012

02.06.12 - UCB Roundtable: Question #1

(please excuse the technical difficulties resulting in poor layout/color publishing)


A couple times a year, the United Cardinal Bloggers participate in a roundtable discussion, and ask each other questions for a few weeks.  Each day, one member poses one (fairly specific) question to the group.  The group answers the question, and usually more discussion is sparked by topics that branch off from there, making for an interesting email thread.  At the end of the day (or at some point afterwards), the responses are collected and posted on the question-asking member's blog.  I was fortunate enough to have drawn the leadoff spot for this particular roundtable discussion, and in a related story, there was no shortage of responses.


The question I posed was as follows:  "What do you expect out of the projected front three starters (Carpenter, Wainwright, Garcia) in regular season wins and innings pitched, from each of those three?".  I gave my answer, and throughout the day, received 18 responses with the opinions of others, including a couple of responses via twitter.  As I mentioned before, other discussions are often sparked, and topics branch off the original question--this was no different. Some of those discussions led to me to add a little context here before posting all the responses, as to minimize misinterpretation...etc of the topic.


First, my direct quotes from the initial question:




Roughly 50 weeks ago Cardinal nation held their collective breath, wondering about the health of Adam Wainwright.  Everyone was on pins and needles until those two dreaded words were spoken: "Tommy John".  Fast forward to now: 1s & 2s will report to 2012 Spring Training in a matter of days, and all eyes will be on Waino, to see how he looks.  No LaRussa looking on, no Duncan, and certainly no shortage of speculation.  The rotation will play a tremendous part of the success of this club in 2012 (as it always does).

Last year, Carp threw a career high 2731/3  total innings, at the age of 36.  Jamie Garcia, in his 2nd full year with the club last year, threw 2201/3, after going only 1631/3 in his 2010 rookie season.  Lohse & Westbrook threw 200+ and 185+ IP in 2011, and while that's short of the career high for both of them, the rotation doesn't rely as heavily on starters number 4 & 5 as it does 1, 2, & 3.

Given the circumstances of Carp, Waino, & Garcia, heading into the 2012 season, I'd ask this: What do you expect out of the projected front three starters in regular season wins & innings pitched from each of those three?  As always, you're free to expand on your answers and give the reasons why you answered the way you did, or include additional comments.  Looking forward to your responses.

--end of quote

There's more to the conversations that followed than just the pure numbers, but for this post, I'll share the responses and a few numbers at the end.  Instances were multiple answers were given ("I think Wainwright wins between 10 and 13 this year"), the range will be displayed.  Responses are displayed as "W / IP"

Let's start with the horse...


14/195 - Shoptaw
16/204 - Noles
15/195 - Knuppel (T)
13-14/200+ - DeRousse
15/210 - Carelli
15/215 - Reynolds
8/79 - Giles
14/225 - Knuppel (R)
14/<200 - Netherton
16/190 - Tomasiks
15-16/185 - Reed
13/205 - Mallonee
13/210 - Nick @ PH8
15/187 - Whitener
15/187 - Adams (via twitter)
13/210 - Wagner (via twitter)
13/190 - Powell

High W: 16 (3: Noles, Tomasiks, Reed)
High IP: 225 (Knuppel, R)
Low W: 8 (Giles)
Low IP: 79 (Giles)
Avg W: 15.72
Avg IP: 193.28



17/210 - Shoptaw
15/198 - Noles
10/165 - Knuppel (T)
11/170 - DeRousse
12/175 - Carelli
15/205 - Reynolds
13/168 - Giles
14/182 - Knuppel (R)
10/165 - Netherton
15/175 - Tomasiks
11-12/180 - Reed
13/160 - Mallonee
14/175 - Nick @ PH8
17/205 - Whitener
18/180 - Adams (via twitter)
20/230 - Wagner (via twitter)
14/175 - Powell

High W: 20 (Wagner)
High IP: 230 (Wagner)
Low W: 10 (2: Knuppel, T., Netherton)
Low IP: 160 (Mallonee)
Avg W: 14.36
Avg IP: 185



14/202.3 - Shoptaw
15/205 - Noles
18/209 - Knuppel (T)
16-18/220 - DeRousse
17/205 - Carelli
14/200 - Reynolds
18/196 - Giles
16/198 - Knuppel (R)
20/220+ - Netherton
18/199 - Tomasiks
18/210 - Reed
14/190 - Mallonee
16/200 - Nick @ PH8
14/189 - Whitener
16/180 - Adams (via twitter)
12/195 - Wagner (via twitter)
16/197 - Powell

High W: 20 (Netherton)
High IP: 220+ (Netherton)
Low W: 12 (Wagner)
Low IP: 180 (Adams)
Avg W: 16.17
Avg IP: 201.13


I suppose you may have noticed that my name didn't appear in those lists.  It's true, I saved mine for last (though, did include my submissions into compiling the average, as well as high/low considerations).  Mine?

29 - 15/192
50 - 19/212
54 - 18/204

A few points that came up during the discussion that I'd like to briefly address are outlined below, as well as some light explanations and thought processes as to how I arrived at my somewhat Kool-aid-esque guesses.
  1. It was brought up that "wins", as a stat, weren't a great stat in determining a pitcher's effectiveness.  I couldn't agree more, and I'll bet Felix Hernandez agrees.  I've got this saying I use a lot, "Numbers don't lie, it's true.  But they rarely tell the whole story."  I wanted to keep things fairly clean & simple in this format, though, so I went with W & IP.
  2. You may not be aware, that during the 2011 season, Jamie Garcia exited the game in line for the win, but didn't get it (via blown save, for example) on 9 different occasions!  (Most in MLB)  Outside of some mental issues that come with the territory of his youth & general inexperience at the major league level, Garcia pitched very well in 2011, though his record may not reflect that fully*.  *see "wins" argument from two seconds ago.
  3. In 2010 Garcia came back from Tommy John surgery, and pitched so well that he worked his way into the ROY conversation.  An exceptional 2010 rookie class would deny him the honor, but what a statement that makes.  In 2012 Adam Wainwright will come back from Tommy John surgery, and while everyone responds differently to surgical procedures, I believe that Adam Wainwright is a better pitcher (with better "stuff") than Garcia.  This was one of the primary reasons behind my high expectations for #50 in 2012.
  4. I tend to think win totals are likely to be higher across the board with this rotation in 2012, based on the offense they'll have supporting them.  Pujols struggled in 2011, especially early.  The bullpen tried their hardest throughout April to mathematically eliminate the Cards from postseason possibilities.  Not to mention, the Cards didn't have Beltran, or a full season of contributions from a healthy Matt Holliday (124 Games in 2011) or David Freese (97 Games in 2011).  I think it's safe to say the offense will be at least as potent as it was last season, likely more so.  Add to that a National League Central that has no Prince Fielder (and probably missing Braun until late May), and questions about power & offense in every other NLC city, save maybe Cincinnati, and I think that rising tide lifts all boats.

Anyway, not that I feel the need to defend my admittedly optimistic predictions, but I thought giving a bit of context might help shed some light & understanding on the numbers, and why I chose the ones I did.  Thanks for reading!  Be sure to check out RetroSimba for UCB Roundtable question #2!




Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Win the Official MLB 2011 World Series DVD set

Before the launch of CTTF, things were set in motion on our sister blog, Good Morning, Good Afternoon, Goodnight to review the A&E official MLB 2011 World Series DVD.  I was sent a copy of the DVD, and asked to write a review, and give a few copies away.  Rather than duplicate the entire post from over there, I'll just link to it...and encourage you to enter the contest to win your free copy!

Monday, November 21, 2011

Happy 91st, Stan! 11.21.11



The greatest Cardinal of them all?  Of them ALL?  It's not even close.

I can't even count how many times I've debated with friends, work colleagues and even strangers about the true historical significance of what we're fortunate enough to be seeing right now, in the daily play of Albert Pujols.  At local establishments, in line at the store, via social media, or over work e-mail threads, the debate continues: Is Albert Pujols the best player in Cardinals history?  I've never hesitated to take a hard, objective look at numbers when making comparisons, and as far as stacking the deck?  No chance.  I'll put Albert's numbers up against those of Gehrig, Ruth, Williams...etc. You name the Hall of Fame player, and I've probably stacked Albert's numbers up against theirs in some way, shape or form at one time or another.

The most common issue with doing these comparisons is one simple thing: Albert is still playing, and most of the folks with whom he's being compared have long since retired--some only from baseball, some from this earthly life also.  Albert stacks up favorably with all of these HOF guys, and there aren't too many people, even in the national media, who wouldn't agree:  If Albert Pujols never plays another game in his life, he is a no-doubt first-ballot Hall of Famer.

But, yet, a very small quiet (and I imagine, under-educated or uninformed) group of people are starting to ask themselves: Is Albert Pujols the greatest Cardinal of all time?


Stan "The Man" Musial (left) with Cardinals first baseman Albert Pujols  (2009)

Believe you me, if any of these people are living in the St. Louis area, they're probably not wondering this aloud.  At least not in front of anyone.

If you have any question in your mind as to whether Albert Pujols is the greatest Cardinal of them all, or if as most people believe (including 99.9% of Cardinals fans & Albert himself), it’s Stan “the man” Musial, consider the following career numbers:

Avg Slg OPS Hits HR RBI All-Star     MVPs      Top-10 MVP votes    WS
Pujols    .328       .617     1.037      2,073       445        1,329     9 times     3           10      2
Musial    .331       .559       .976      3,630       475        1,951     24 times      3                   14                         3


I’m not so drunk on the Cardinal Kool-Aid that I’m blind to obvious things.  But, looking at those stats, it’s important to remember the ways that the game has changed.  This isn’t the same baseball game that was being played in the 1940’s & 1950’s.

If you weren’t aware, Stan didn’t play in the 1945 season during the prime of his career.  Why?  Not for reasons like today’s players, such asTommy John surgery.  No, Stan Musial stepped away from the game he dominated in order to serve in the United States Navy, and protect you & I.  Instead of defending the right field line, he was defending our country’s freedom in World War II.  (You may recall last off-season Stan was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the highest honor a United States President can bestow upon a civilian.)  Then after a year away from the game, all he did was come back in 1946 to hit .365, collect 228 hits, including 50 doubles, had an OPS over 1.000, and had 103 RBI on his way to winning the NL MVP and the World Series. Talk about being “The man”!

Mind? Blown.

I’ll grant you that Albert has played just 11 full seasons, and Stan played for 22, so basic projections & assumptions would have Pujols surpassing Musial’s statistical numbers (some of them, anyway. Others, not so much) with relative ease.  IF he remains a Cardinal.  Which, I believe he will, but as of the time this was written, the uniform Pujols wears in 2012 and beyond has yet to be officially decided, or at least formally announced.

There are countless things about Stan Musial that can be (and have been) written that go well beyond any blog post on the internet.  So, today, on Stan’s 91st birthday, I honor him once more, and encourage you to do the same.  For me?  Today?  Stan Musial is still far & away the greatest Cardinal of them all.  And it’s not even close.